• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Why No Result In Over 18 Years!

    CHANGES TO CFRs ARE IN BUREAUCRATIC LIMBO

     

    NOW is the time to speak up! NOW is when you can help yourself and your colleagues. Use the listed contact information below to demand immediate action by the Coast Guard to implement the updated CFRS for Diving. They have all the necessary information and have had two comment periods for the public and the industry to contribute.

     

    DECADES, years or months are all too long to wait for responsible action. It has been decades since revision of the CFRs pertaining to Diving activities. Years have passed since the NOSAC committee submitted its proposed changes to the CFRs. Months later, after a second period for comments by the industry and the public, the United States Coast Guard has not released the updated CFRs.

     

    The Divers Association urges every interested person to contact the Coast Guard, their governmental representatives and every active company in the Diving industry. The anticipated changes won’t revolutionize anything. All of the proposals are already accepted or exceeded by the professional associations in the United States and IMCA.

     

    Too many lives have been lost or seriously affected by the lack of implementation of more stringent safety measures. Until such measures have the force of law behind them options remain which are chosen for economic reasons or corners are cut so that contractors can remain in business while taking unnecessary chances with the lives of divers. Union and non-union contractors alike want to be as safe as possible. Client companies have varying levels of understanding as to what is safe and what is not. Too often clients see what appears to be excessive personnel and equipment to support what, from their perspective, is simple work. Simple until pressure differential, rigging failure, sea conditions or other factors create an emergency! Dynamic Positioning Systems fail, unseen flaws in rigging or materials cause crushing and trapping incidents and the seafloor or load shifts in unpredictable ways which can injure or trap a diver.

     

    If a dive team member has not seen such emergencies that person has likely not been diving or supporting dive operations for very long. The clients need to be educated regarding the cost in dollars of incidents which can be prevented by having sufficient manning levels, equipment and training which cost less than the aftermath of “accidents” The proposed changes to the CFRs can help. There should be other, more strident changes made also. NOW we can only push for what is prepared and move to the next level. To push for enactment of the proposed changes made by the NOSAC Dive Safety Subcommittee we must contact as many influential people as possible to endorse expediting the approval by the USCG. Below, you will find the Director of Commercial Regulations & Standards and The Project Manager. for Proposed Rule-making (ANPRM) ID: USCG-1998-3785-0115. Mailing and E-mail address are below: Let them know what you think!

     

    Mr. Jeffery G. Lantz

    Director of Commercial Regulations & Standards (CG-5PS)
    U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters
    2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, STOP 7126
    Washington, DC 20593-7126
    202-372-1351 E-Mail Jeffry G. Lantz <Jeffrey.G.Lantz@uscg.mil>

     

    Mr. Ken Smith Project Manager
    Department of Homeland Security
    U.S. Coast Guard
    Commandant (CG-OES-2), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE.,

    STOP 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509
    Phone: 202 372-1413
    E-Mail: ken.a.smith@uscg.mil

     

    If you have suggestions for refinements or additional regulations contact the Divers Association, International Marine Contractors Association, the International Oil & Gas Producers, The Association of Diving Contractors International, your Union and every Diving Contractor.

    Action breeds action. Act! Let those in charge know what you think. You will find all information from1998 tell the present poster here,

    https://www.regulations.gov/docketBrowser?rpp=25&so=ASC&sb=commentDueDate&po=0&dct=N%2BFR%2BPR%2BO&D=USCG-1998-3786

     

     

    Commercial Diving Operations - Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule-making (ANPRM)

    No result in more then 18 years!

     

    large.57ed2333492be_Regulations.govDocketBrowser.png

    My Coast Guard Leter.pdf


      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    User Feedback


    I would suggest that every member of this Association let the regulators know what you think. The Coast Guard does take into consideration all comments whatever Country you are from. Their piss poor regulation and enforcement are adopted by many Nation and need to be changed! You can find your Elected Officials  here  https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

    1 person likes this

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.


    Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Pro Memoriam

    • David Mato Garrido
      David Mato Garrido
    • Christopher Whittaker
      Christopher Whittaker
    • Fernando Robles Aller
      Fernando Robles Aller
    • Edward Hayman
      Edward Hayman
    • Mohammed Borhan Jamal
      Mohammed Borhan Jamal
    • Daniel Heres Ã�lvarez
      Daniel Heres �lvarez
    • Gerald Chia
      Gerald Chia
    • Chris Hollifield
      Chris Hollifield
    • Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
      Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
    • Sondre Birkeland
      Sondre Birkeland
    • Marc Begnaud
      Marc Begnaud
    • Tony Eke
      Tony Eke
    • Jamie York
      Jamie York
    • Jacup Andreas Hentze
      Jacup Andreas Hentze
    • Peter Small
      Peter Small
    • Paul De Waal
      Paul De Waal
    • NK Sharma
      NK Sharma
    • Brian Ernest
      Brian Ernest
    • Cristian Zarafu
      Cristian Zarafu
    • Leticia Castiglione
      Leticia Castiglione
    • Dave Courcoux
      Dave Courcoux
    • Olivier Rouxhet
      Olivier Rouxhet
    • Christopher Logan
      Christopher Logan
    • Jean Christophe Casagrande
      Jean Christophe Casagrande
    • Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
      Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
    • Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
      Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
    • Stephen O'Malley
      Stephen O'Malley
    • JS Padda
      JS Padda
    • S.S. Chauhan
      S.S. Chauhan
    • Godwin Udoh
      Godwin Udoh
    • Jonathon Parker
      Jonathon Parker
    • David Scheinost
      David Scheinost
    • Louis Ricciarelli
      Louis Ricciarelli
    • Luke Rupping
      Luke Rupping
    • Kevin George
      Kevin George
    • Thiago Matheus Coutinho
      Thiago Matheus Coutinho
    • Brian Pilkington
      Brian Pilkington
    • Joseph Gould
      Joseph Gould
    • Ottavio Baumgartner
      Ottavio Baumgartner
    • Ajesh Gaur
      Ajesh Gaur
    • Marko Knaps
      Marko Knaps
    • Earl Guidry
      Earl Guidry
    • Kenny Kruckenberg
      Kenny Kruckenberg
    • Chandra
      Chandra
    • David Mitchell
      David Mitchell
    • Russ Robinson
      Russ Robinson
    • Javier Diaz Macias
      Javier Diaz Macias
    • Travis Muller
      Travis Muller
    • Rafael Santos Aragão
      Rafael Santos Aragão
    • Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
      Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
    • Radoslav Stoyanov
      Radoslav Stoyanov
    • Pervinder Kadiyan
      Pervinder Kadiyan
    • Israel Franco Marino
      Israel Franco Marino
    • Rob Holbrook
      Rob Holbrook
    • Chandon McGrath
      Chandon McGrath
    • Dhirendra Kadiyan
      Dhirendra Kadiyan
    • Luke Seabrook
      Luke Seabrook
    • Chris Wilson
      Chris Wilson
    • Matt Smock
      Matt Smock
    • Pierre Rossouw
      Pierre Rossouw
    • John Webb
      John Webb
    • Miura Yusuke
      Miura Yusuke
    • Jarrod Hampton
      Jarrod Hampton
    • David Sparks
      David Sparks
    • Rajesh Dabbas
      Rajesh Dabbas
    • Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
      Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
    • Julio Dacosta Gallo
      Julio Dacosta Gallo
    • Steve Acton
      Steve Acton
  • Latest Incident Follow Up Posts

    • Paspaley pearl diver Jarrod Hampton's family seeking answers as inquest into death set down for May The family of a Victorian pearl diver who died off WA's north-west coast has welcomed the scheduling of an inquest five years on, saying lives continued to be put at risk by alleged dubious safety practices. Jarrod Hampton was working as a drift diver for the Paspaley Pearling Company in April 2012 when he got into trouble in the water off Eighty Mile Beach. By the time he was pulled aboard his boat, its crew was unable to revive him. A 10-day coronial inquest has now been set down to run in Perth in May, with Mr Hampton's parents Robyn and Tony and their two other sons planning to travel from their home in Victoria to attend. Ms Hampton welcomed the announcement of the inquest and said she felt "very optimistic". "We've waited many years to get that news. There was a time we thought we weren't going to get an inquest," she said. "We will learn what they did do and what they perhaps should have done, and what maybe should have been in place." Ms Hampton said the doubt surrounding just how her son died had added to the family's distress. "We only live with the memories of him, and we miss him, and the dynamics of our family have changed forever ... we're overwhelmed by his loss," she said.   Family criticises 'archaic' regulations In the wake of the death, safety watchdog WorkSafe charged Paspaley with failing to provide a safe work environment, to which the company pleaded guilty and was fined $60,000. The Broome District Court heard it took the Paspaley crew between five and 10 minutes to bring Mr Hampton onto a boat, at which time efforts to revive him were unsuccessful. However, no charge was ever laid relation to Mr Hampton's death, and there has been no suggestion the company was responsible. The Hampton family has been scathing of the relatively loose regulation of the pearling industry and the lack of change in the wake of their son's death. "There's been no significant improvements, nothing done that would protect someone's life," Ms Hampton said. Pearl diving is regulated under the general diving regulations rather than commercial diving regulations, and Ms Hampton said the inquest would provide an opportunity to have that reviewed. "All the pearl divers must get a commercial fishing licence, so the WA state does see their job as commercial fishing, and yet they've managed to maintain a very archaic diving regulation, the general diving regulations."   Review underway but progress unclear Both Paspaley and the WA Pearl Producers Association have defended the industry's safety record, pointing out that deaths are very rare and saying improvements had been made in recent years. The State Government said in the wake of Mr Hampton's death that it would review safety regulations, but it appears there has been little progress. A working group was formed by WorkSafe after court proceedings finished in 2015 to assess what industry changes were needed. The ABC understands the group has met several times, and is looking at whether the existing non-enforceable industry code of practice needs to be upgraded to a commission code. Diving guidelines are also being reviewed nationally, a process Worksafe has said could have implications for the training requirements in WA's pearling industry. The WA Pearl Producers Association and WorkSafe have been contacted for comment.   Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-22/paspaley-pearl-diver-jarrod-hampton-family-welcomes-inquest-wa/8292170 Feb 22 2017
    • Taken from: http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/nova-scotia/luke-seabrook-diving-death-accident-tidal-power-plant-1.3678009   No closure for family of diver killed at Nova Scotia tidal plant a year ago
      Luke Seabrook's family on mission to prevent divers from dying on the job   The family of a Dartmouth man killed on the job at Nova Scotia Power's Annapolis Tidal Power Plant a year ago is still seeking answers about how and why his death happened. Commercial diver Luke Seabrook, 39, died last July 15 while inspecting the dam's underwater gates. The generating station is located where the powerful Bay of Fundy tides meet the Annapolis River in Annapolis Royal. "He didn't have a hope in hell, nobody would," said Angela Seabrook, Luke's mother, as she stared at the rushing water pouring out of the dam. The Wasaga Beach, Ont., woman travelled to Nova Scotia to see the plant for herself on the eve of the anniversary.   'I need to know' "I have to find out what happened and why it happened before I can forgive," she said. "There might not be anybody to blame for this. It could just be an accident, but I need to know."
      His family has received details from Jarvis DesRoche, the backup diver, who along with the diver supervisor, were providing support from the shore. Luke Seabrook was carrying out the annual inspection of the gate as part of Paul's Diving Service Inc. It was a job he'd done before.  Within a minute or two of going underwater, Seabrook signalled to come up. His support team couldn't pull him up but the line wouldn't budge, so they tied off his line in hopes he wouldn't be dragged farther away. 
      "If Jarvis had gone down, there would be two of them dead," Angela Seabrook said. DesRoche had to wait about an hour for the tides on both sides of the dam gate to equalize before he could retrieve his friend's body.
      Seabrook says her son was found stuck in the gate, which wasn't fully closed, as it should have been. His helmet was wedged in the gap.  The opening allowed the force of the world's highest tides to surge through. The differential pressure on either side of the gate creates a powerful suction. That pressure can be in the tonnes. In the diving world, that hazard is called Delta P, and it's one of the leading causes of death for occupational divers.   'I hope he didn't suffer' Luke Seabrook was found with broken ribs and contusions to his head. His suit was ripped, his mouthpiece was loose.  "I don't know whether he died because his lungs were crushed or he drowned," Angela Seabrook said. She's still waiting for the autopsy report's official cause of death. "All I know is I hope he didn't suffer." For the last year, the provincial department of Labour has been investigating the workplace fatality. It typically takes two years before findings are released and charges, if warranted, are laid. Seabrook's fear is that another diver could die on the job in the meantime.   Department denies CBC request CBC News has asked to see the department's stop-work and compliance orders slapped on Nova Scotia Power and Paul's Diving Service Inc. Those requests have been denied, and that decision is waiting to be reviewed. Rejecting a request for labour department orders is unusual. In previous cases, the department has provided the information to CBC News. Nova Scotia Power has declined an interview. And the dive support team members have not responded to an interview request.   'Things haven't changed' Seabrook has enlisted the help of diving expert Stephen Donovan in her quest for answers. In the '90s, Donovan was a member of the working group that drafted Nova Scotia's diving regulations. He says he walked away from the group because it was split with infighting among different diving groups that had competing interests. The end result, he says, was watered-down regulations. "Things haven't changed from when I was diving in the Bay of Fundy in the middle of the '70s," said Donovan. "Yes, we have better equipment but we still are losing people." Donovan finds it deeply troubling that Luke Seabrook was likely killed because of a danger that is nothing new – differential pressure at a dam.  He says he believes Seabrook's death was preventable. It's high time, he says, for the diving community to make safety a priority.  "Very frustrating that changes haven't been made that I think should've been made."   'We feel forgotten' The wait for information has been agonizing for Seabrook's widow, Sheryl. They were newlyweds when Luke was killed. His last text was haunting and sweet. "Going to work with the changing tides. I love you, I'll talk to you soon," she recalled. The 36-year-old has tried to go back to work, but she's been unsuccessful. Diving was a passion she shared with her husband, but now she can't go back in the water. On this first anniversary of Seabrook's death, she plans to go to the plant for the first time where she'll spend time in quiet meditation.  She'll find a wreath attached to a chain link fence surrounding the dam. It's the only hint of the tragedy. But there will be no closure.  "I think that's something that can only come after the full investigation is disclosed to us, if and when," she said. "We feel forgotten."   
    • If Mrs. Rupping has engaged Delise  - or any other attorney - she has a good chance of getting her answers. The timing will be a negative aspect, I'm sure, although she has had SOME monies sent to her. I smell a rat when the Supervisor says it was his personal money he sent. This sounds very much like Mammoet is trying to insert a layer of plausible denial into the situation...