Jump to content
Divers Association
  • Sign in to follow this  

    The Toolbox Safety Meeting

      Toolbox Safety Meetings have been around now for about 30 years. Rather than being an out-dated concept, the Toolbox Safety Meeting is more relevant today than it ever was. But are we using them to their full potential?





    About thirty years ago, a revolutionary change was made in workplace safety; the Toolbox Safety Meeting was introduced. Also called a “Toolbox Talk”, “Tailgate Talk” and “Safety Minute”, these meetings had an almost immediate impact on each and every industry where they were introduced, in that there was a marked decrease in industrial accidents. The reason for this is that, when conducted properly, these Toolbox Safety Meetings encourage active participation by, and input from the front line workers.



    With the evolution of the Risk Assessment and Hazard Analysis process in the workplace, there was a further decrease noted in industrial accidents. The Toolbox Safety Meeting, rather than becoming redundant, has fit right into this process, becoming the part of the process where the people who actually perform the work get involved each day.



    The importance of the Toolbox Meeting cannot be over-stressed. A large percentage of workplace fatality investigations show one common and alarming trait: either the Toolbox Safety Meeting was not used, or the meetings were not taken seriously by management or employees and were often totally irrelevant to the tasks being performed. These meetings cause the workers to stop and think about their jobs, the tasks they perform, the hazards and they could face, and how to mitigate or eliminate the hazards. It has been demonstrated that daily meetings keep safety foremost in the minds of the employees so supervisors have a responsibility to ensure the meetings are held, the employees participate, and the topics are relevant.



    I was working as Diving Supervisor at one offshore installation when the Safety Officer insisted that the diving crew participate in the platform toolbox meeting and not hold a separate meeting. The topics he showed me included the following: working safely in the galley; housekeeping; working with paint and chemicals; keeping the platform stairwells safe; working at height; and fire prevention on the platform. Although these are all fine topics for platform personnel, they really are not relevant to the diving crew, and therefore I pulled rank and held a separate and dedicated daily toolbox for my diving crew. The Toolbox Meeting, particularly at the start of any given project, needs to address the hazards identified by the Job Hazard Analysis, but it needs to address those hazards that the diving crew will be exposed to. When the diving crew is working closely with other trades, such as during underwater lifting operations, the crane operator and the signalmen (banksmen) need to be included in the Toolbox Meeting along with the divers. If the divers will be working in a differential pressure area such as a hydro dam or a navigation lock, the operators of these facilities also need to be involved in the toolbox. It makes absolutely no sense at all to have a diving crew sitting through a Toolbox Meeting that is discussing how to prevent fires and food poisoning in a galley.



    The Diving Supervisor has a legal, moral, and ethical responsibility to do everything within his power to keep his diver and the diving crew safe from harm. It has been demonstrated that a properly conducted Toolbox Meeting will make a huge difference in how the crew performs their jobs, and will help prevent an industrial accident from occurring. So therefore, the Diving Supervisor has a legal and moral responsibility to hold a Toolbox Meeting, and to ensure the crew’s participation in it. If the meeting does not hold crew’s interest, it is a waste of time. The Toolbox Meeting needs to be seen for what it really is: an opportunity to teach the diving crew the safe way to perform tasks, and to refresh their memory. It is not a chance to talk about football scores, check text messages, or log into facebook.


    As stated earlier, the Job Hazard Analysis fits into, and goes along with the Toolbox Meeting. But what if you are on a long term project and nothing is changing day-to-day? What if you are on a pipelay barge doing the odd stinger check or you are just performing the exact same tasks every day? Anyone who works with divers will tell you the first thing you learn is they all suffer from ADD or ADHD. You have to work hard to keep their attention, and repetition of the same information every day is not going to do the trick. When I am on the job as Diving Superintendent, I always provide my Supervisors with a list of relevant toolbox topics that they can either follow or pick from. Yes, when the crew is changing to a new operation you definitely want to perform a Job Hazard Analysis and a related Toolbox. And periodically throughout each project this information needs to be reviewed. But constant repetition is just going to make the Toolbox Meeting into Diver’s Nap Time, and that will do nothing to keep the lads safe and avoid accidents. One way of keeping the attention of the crew is to avoid repetition of subject matter. The other way is to get them involved. You were not hired to be a preacher or a politician, so do not make speeches. Talk to the crew and get their input. It is a great way to find out what they know and what they don’t. In a toolbox talk I held offshore Louisianna, I discovered that half of my crew did not know how to check the polarity of cutting or welding gear. That gave me a chance to teach them how to check polarity, and teach them why it is important to have the correct polarity. And that brings us to another issue: the Diving Supervisor should make sure he is teaching his crew correctly when teaching them tasks. So the responsible Diving Supervisor will do a quick read-up on the topic he is using for the toolbox, and that reading up should not be Google or Wikipedia, but a proper diver training manual, the US Navy Diving Manual or a corporate diving manual based on the US Navy Manual.





    Deploying the standby diver – how to do it right

    Recognizing signs and symptoms of hypothermia

    Proper hydration for divers in warm weather

    Proper PPE for the job you are performing

    High pressure lines and whip checks

    Avoiding back injuries on the job and at home

    Umbilical management

    Safe handling of oxygen

    Loss of communications to the diver

    Lock-out Tag-out when working on vessels

    Good housekeeping around the diving spread

    PMS – why the Planned Maintenance System is important to divers

    Loss of air supply to the diver and how to deal with it

    Emergency drills – they can save your life

    Recognizing the signs and symptoms of Decompression Sickness

    Lifting underwater loads with a crane safely

    Safety tips for burning with Broco gear

    CONVENTID – the signs and symptoms of CNS Oxygen Toxicity

    Recovery of an injured diver – how we do it

    The Pre-Dive Checks on the diver --- take them seriously

    Proper Procedure for diving and deck operations at night

    Slips, Trips and Falls

    Working at height (and doing it right)

    CO Carbon Monoxide – the silent killer

    Life Jackets, Work Vests and Floatation Devices

    Prescription Drugs and Diving – what you need to know

    Differential Pressure and the diver

    Electrical Safety around the dive spread

    Personal Fitness for the diver

    Working over the side (greasing LARS, etc.)

    The importance of Chamber Maintenance

    Fire prevention in the Dive Control van

    The Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)

    Awareness of your surroundings can keep you alive

    The right tool for the job

    Stop and think BEFORE you act

    Safety when using air or hydraulic powered tools

    Stored energy – hidden danger awaits (rope, cable and chain under strain)

    Contingency Planning – it may save your life



    Edited by Hal Lomax

    • Thanks 1

      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  

    User Feedback

    There are no comments to display.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Pro Memoriam

    • Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
      Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
    • Ajesh Gaur
      Ajesh Gaur
    • Christopher Logan
      Christopher Logan
    • Luke Seabrook
      Luke Seabrook
    • Chandra
    • Travis Muller
      Travis Muller
    • Rob Holbrook
      Rob Holbrook
    • Dhirendra Kadiyan
      Dhirendra Kadiyan
    • Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
      Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
    • Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
      Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
    • Chandon McGrath
      Chandon McGrath
    • Jonathon Parker
      Jonathon Parker
    • Marc Begnaud
      Marc Begnaud
    • Joseph Gould
      Joseph Gould
    • Mohammed Borhan Jamal
      Mohammed Borhan Jamal
    • Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
      Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
    • Israel Franco Marino
      Israel Franco Marino
    • Kevin George
      Kevin George
    • Dave Courcoux
      Dave Courcoux
    • Louis Ricciarelli
      Louis Ricciarelli
    • Pierre Rossouw
      Pierre Rossouw
    • Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
      Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
    • Pervinder Kadiyan
      Pervinder Kadiyan
    • Olivier Rouxhet
      Olivier Rouxhet
    • Christopher Whittaker
      Christopher Whittaker
    • Javier Diaz Macias
      Javier Diaz Macias
    • Steve Acton
      Steve Acton
    • Paul De Waal
      Paul De Waal
    • Thiago Matheus Coutinho
      Thiago Matheus Coutinho
    • Jamie York
      Jamie York
    • Sondre Birkeland
      Sondre Birkeland
    • David Scheinost
      David Scheinost
    • S.S. Chauhan
      S.S. Chauhan
    • Luke Rupping
      Luke Rupping
    • Chris Wilson
      Chris Wilson
    • David Mitchell
      David Mitchell
    • Ottavio Baumgartner
      Ottavio Baumgartner
    • Tony Eke
      Tony Eke
    • Matt Smock
      Matt Smock
    • Stephen O'Malley
      Stephen O'Malley
    • Jarrod Hampton
      Jarrod Hampton
    • Peter Small
      Peter Small
    • Fernando Robles Aller
      Fernando Robles Aller
    • Leticia Castiglione
      Leticia Castiglione
    • Brian Ernest
      Brian Ernest
    • Rafael Santos Aragão
      Rafael Santos Aragão
    • Earl Guidry
      Earl Guidry
    • Marko Knaps
      Marko Knaps
    • Jean Christophe Casagrande
      Jean Christophe Casagrande
    • JS Padda
      JS Padda
    • Chris Hollifield
      Chris Hollifield
    • David Mato Garrido
      David Mato Garrido
    • David Sparks
      David Sparks
    • Kenny Kruckenberg
      Kenny Kruckenberg
    • Edward Hayman
      Edward Hayman
    • Julio Dacosta Gallo
      Julio Dacosta Gallo
    • Godwin Udoh
      Godwin Udoh
    • NK Sharma
      NK Sharma
    • Cristian Zarafu
      Cristian Zarafu
    • Radoslav Stoyanov
      Radoslav Stoyanov
    • Rajesh Dabbas
      Rajesh Dabbas
    • Daniel Heres Ã�lvarez
      Daniel Heres �lvarez
    • Russ Robinson
      Russ Robinson
    • Miura Yusuke
      Miura Yusuke
    • Gerald Chia
      Gerald Chia
    • Billy Ray Lillard
      Billy Ray Lillard
    • Brian Pilkington
      Brian Pilkington
    • John Webb
      John Webb
  • Latest Incident Follow Up Posts

    • Looks like they are definitely still in business. I can't understand how a company like this can kill a diver and just shut their eyes and go on about business. They know that the only way to stop these stupid accidents from happening is to come forth with details, yet they circle the wagons and cover everything up. So the next time when the same thing happens, these people are equally at fault. Then I have to wonder - where is IMCA in this? Why did they not investigate and release findings to avoid a repeat of this?
    • This is their web page talking it say theyhave contracts https://www.mammoet.com/en/news/
    • I would push to have the Labour Board examine NS Power's role in the incident. You will note I did not call it an accident, because in my opinion it was not.