Jump to content
Divers Association
  • Sign in to follow this  


    Firstly, I want to wish each of you health and prosperity through the Holidays, whichever you celebrate, and in the future!

    PLEASE respond if you see the advisability of attempting to consolidate all authority over Commercial diving operations (in the USA and its territories) under the mission of the U.S. Coast Guard. The confusion and inadequate auditing/investigation/prosecution of diving operations will never be acceptable until this is done, in my opinion and that of many others with whom I have discussed this move.

    The USCG recently introduced a rate for USCG Diver - a rating which heretofore did not exist. This development will create career divers in the USCG and that will result in well-trained personnel who will be proficient in diving operations and safety. These personnel will be obvious candidates to undertake audits and investigations. Consolidating authority will eliminate the grey areas of oversight and expedite desirable improvements. "Bessie" is only interested in scientific and archeological diving and OSHA has a shown a lack of effectiveness, even interest in proactive involvement in enforcement of existing regulations. Injured divers and the survivors of divers killed at work have little backup and the attorneys they engage have to fight uphill in almost every instance.

    Active pursuit of the consolidation of authority will require some proactive effort by divers, support personnel, Contractors and law firms. This will not happen unless the first steps are taken. Details can be worked out. The Lawmakers who control appropriations must be educated in the need for such responsibility to be added to the USCG mission as it will require additional funding. The costs will be offset by reducing loss of life and injuries which become a financial burden to the government and diving contractors will save money because of reduced costs in assuring compliance and in legal fees. Attorney Bobby Delise has said more than once that he would like to be put out of the diving lawsuit business and he has made a fine career out of handling legal actions which result from injuries and fatalities to divers!

    I urge you to endorse this effort and too pitch in when it starts! Your FIRST act needs to be stating that you approve the effort to Consolidate Authority...

    • Like 2

      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  

    User Feedback

    Mister John , i would like to say my view , i'm a European Diver , move in the USA a while ago, after 12 years of Diving in the Offshore industry ,saturation, Air diving , construction , installation etc around the World  .. i have finally a chance to work in the United States, in  a small Harbor  company in the West Coast,  and was very impressive to me the way the Divers & Supervisors works,  they reach the work schedule target as well, but with very lack of safety , for me all this come from a bad regulations which no one respects the basic  lines  , like wearing bailouts only when its over 20 feet depth, no one use harness under the Harvest jacket, IMCA guide, (specially if you work in sat with DP ) its very important , i saw divers working over 8 hours in shallow diving depths , because lack of crew,   somebody told me, ( if you works 8 hours in a office , why you could not do the same as diver?)    i would love if IMCA one day could show up here too        thanks for your time &


    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for your observation, blueshark! What you referred to is EXACTLY why it will help if ALL authority over diving operations are assigned to the USCG.

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What has to happen too, is the adoption of IMCA guidelines. This is likely to prove to be a stumbling block though as IMCA is not a US body.


    Consolidate authority under USCG, and adhere to IMCA guidelines, and you will improve diver safety in the US.

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    John, is there a possibility that we will be heard with the new incoming administration? Perhaps if we make the case to them that in the US, there are more stringent occupational safety regulations for a janitor than there are for a  working diver, that the death and injury rates for man hours worked are atrocious, that existing US safety regulations pale in comparison to "Third World" countries, and that due to the lack of consolidation of authority over the industry there is no hope of the statistics changing without seeing significant change in regulation and enforcement?


    We could also make it clear to them that there is no need to re-invent the wheel, as far as safety regulations go. Between IMCA D014 and IOGP 411 they can "cut and paste" so to speak, and end up with a substantial and workable regulation. I can assure you that neither IMCA nor IOGP would have a problem with their documents being used as a baseline for regulations.

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Pro Memoriam

    • S.S. Chauhan
      S.S. Chauhan
    • Rob Holbrook
      Rob Holbrook
    • Kevin George
      Kevin George
    • Jamie York
      Jamie York
    • Thiago Matheus Coutinho
      Thiago Matheus Coutinho
    • Travis Muller
      Travis Muller
    • Dave Courcoux
      Dave Courcoux
    • Kenny Kruckenberg
      Kenny Kruckenberg
    • David Sparks
      David Sparks
    • Chris Hollifield
      Chris Hollifield
    • Paul De Waal
      Paul De Waal
    • Israel Franco Marino
      Israel Franco Marino
    • Russ Robinson
      Russ Robinson
    • Christopher Logan
      Christopher Logan
    • Tony Eke
      Tony Eke
    • Fernando Robles Aller
      Fernando Robles Aller
    • Stephen O'Malley
      Stephen O'Malley
    • Christopher Whittaker
      Christopher Whittaker
    • NK Sharma
      NK Sharma
    • Steve Acton
      Steve Acton
    • Marc Begnaud
      Marc Begnaud
    • Ajesh Gaur
      Ajesh Gaur
    • John Webb
      John Webb
    • Leticia Castiglione
      Leticia Castiglione
    • Louis Ricciarelli
      Louis Ricciarelli
    • Gerald Chia
      Gerald Chia
    • Chris Wilson
      Chris Wilson
    • Godwin Udoh
      Godwin Udoh
    • Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
      Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
    • Chandon McGrath
      Chandon McGrath
    • Cristian Zarafu
      Cristian Zarafu
    • Matt Smock
      Matt Smock
    • Joseph Gould
      Joseph Gould
    • Billy Ray Lillard
      Billy Ray Lillard
    • Luke Seabrook
      Luke Seabrook
    • Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
      Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
    • Brian Pilkington
      Brian Pilkington
    • David Mitchell
      David Mitchell
    • Pervinder Kadiyan
      Pervinder Kadiyan
    • Rafael Santos Aragão
      Rafael Santos Aragão
    • Mohammed Borhan Jamal
      Mohammed Borhan Jamal
    • Jonathon Parker
      Jonathon Parker
    • Miura Yusuke
      Miura Yusuke
    • Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
      Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
    • David Scheinost
      David Scheinost
    • Dhirendra Kadiyan
      Dhirendra Kadiyan
    • Jean Christophe Casagrande
      Jean Christophe Casagrande
    • Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
      Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
    • Radoslav Stoyanov
      Radoslav Stoyanov
    • Daniel Heres Ã�lvarez
      Daniel Heres �lvarez
    • Ottavio Baumgartner
      Ottavio Baumgartner
    • Chandra
    • Jarrod Hampton
      Jarrod Hampton
    • Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
      Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
    • Peter Small
      Peter Small
    • JS Padda
      JS Padda
    • Sondre Birkeland
      Sondre Birkeland
    • Earl Guidry
      Earl Guidry
    • Julio Dacosta Gallo
      Julio Dacosta Gallo
    • Olivier Rouxhet
      Olivier Rouxhet
    • Marko Knaps
      Marko Knaps
    • Luke Rupping
      Luke Rupping
    • Edward Hayman
      Edward Hayman
    • David Mato Garrido
      David Mato Garrido
    • Rajesh Dabbas
      Rajesh Dabbas
    • Pierre Rossouw
      Pierre Rossouw
    • Brian Ernest
      Brian Ernest
    • Javier Diaz Macias
      Javier Diaz Macias
  • Latest Incident Follow Up Posts

    • I would say that yes, the power company are likely to be somewhat accountable. It is unlikely to be as clear cut as being wholly a diving company's fault, but more a combination of factors that contribute to an accident.    
    • Ok guys, a question for you all. This is Luke's Mother.  For anyone who has read the articles on his accident, I would like your input.   Does anyone on this forum feel that the power company should have also been somewhat accountable for this?  This was a regular check that apparently had been done times before. I realize the dive company is at fault for not doing a flow test. I am assuming they felt things were as always and never a problem before. Wrong, obviously but things I heard re the gate not closing and possibly why not closing this time due to new operator or debris keeping it open (and yet control room could not determine that flow was high).   Should I just let it go (the contractor alone is charged) or should I push to have Labour Board reassess Power Company's contribution in this?   Any input would be appreciated.   Angela Seabrook   Annapolis Generating Station Construction Project.pdf
    • The following is part of an email received regarding this incident. Other parts have been removed to protect the identity of the emailer:   “At the time of his death, Kevin had been on a jetting job. They were either searching for a pipe or a valve. I do not recall the location.  The trench had been jetted out 20 or so feet below natural bottom. It had not been done very well because they had already experienced some collapses of the wall on either side during the operation. At some point during Kevin's dive he experienced a collapse that resulted in his being completely buried.    Under most circumstances this would not be an issue. One merely "jets" themselves out of the hole and then re-jets the collapsed portion of the trench. Unfortunately, Kevin broke the cardinal rule for jet blasting. He failed to secure the jet nozzle to his wrist with some polyline.    The shock of being struck by the collapse caused him to drop the jet nozzle and it subsequently jetted itself away from him. Two standby divers were utilized to attempt a rescue but were unsuccessful as the material filled in faster than they could jet it away. Kevin was conscious and speaking for a time, but when he finally stopped responding it was decided to "yank" him forcibly out of the trench.    Kevin's umbilical was attached to the crane hook and he was pulled out of the hole. It is a little fuzzy here what happened when they got him to the surface but all attempts at first aid failed.    One point that stuck out was that upon pulling him out of the hole with the crane, his umbilical slipped through the seizing at the QD and subsequently pulled his head down almost to the QD resulting in a broken neck.    Whether or not Kevin was still alive at that point can only be speculated without an autopsy report and I am not aware that one was ever made public. Needless to say, had he still been alive at the time of being "yanked" out of the hole, he certainly would not have been after that.   I am certain that if pursued, an autopsy report could reveal the actual cause of death, but this highlights how important it is to pay attention to the little things. For the want of a four foot piece of polyline, my friend lost his life, I lost a friend, a family lost a fine son, and a fiancé lost a husband.”