• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    SURVEY OF INTEREST IN CONSOLIDATION OF AUTHORITY

    Firstly, I want to wish each of you health and prosperity through the Holidays, whichever you celebrate, and in the future!

    PLEASE respond if you see the advisability of attempting to consolidate all authority over Commercial diving operations (in the USA and its territories) under the mission of the U.S. Coast Guard. The confusion and inadequate auditing/investigation/prosecution of diving operations will never be acceptable until this is done, in my opinion and that of many others with whom I have discussed this move.

    The USCG recently introduced a rate for USCG Diver - a rating which heretofore did not exist. This development will create career divers in the USCG and that will result in well-trained personnel who will be proficient in diving operations and safety. These personnel will be obvious candidates to undertake audits and investigations. Consolidating authority will eliminate the grey areas of oversight and expedite desirable improvements. "Bessie" is only interested in scientific and archeological diving and OSHA has a shown a lack of effectiveness, even interest in proactive involvement in enforcement of existing regulations. Injured divers and the survivors of divers killed at work have little backup and the attorneys they engage have to fight uphill in almost every instance.

    Active pursuit of the consolidation of authority will require some proactive effort by divers, support personnel, Contractors and law firms. This will not happen unless the first steps are taken. Details can be worked out. The Lawmakers who control appropriations must be educated in the need for such responsibility to be added to the USCG mission as it will require additional funding. The costs will be offset by reducing loss of life and injuries which become a financial burden to the government and diving contractors will save money because of reduced costs in assuring compliance and in legal fees. Attorney Bobby Delise has said more than once that he would like to be put out of the diving lawsuit business and he has made a fine career out of handling legal actions which result from injuries and fatalities to divers!

    I urge you to endorse this effort and too pitch in when it starts! Your FIRST act needs to be stating that you approve the effort to Consolidate Authority...

    2 people like this

      Report Article
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    User Feedback


    Mister John , i would like to say my view , i'm a European Diver , move in the USA a while ago, after 12 years of Diving in the Offshore industry ,saturation, Air diving , construction , installation etc around the World  .. i have finally a chance to work in the United States, in  a small Harbor  company in the West Coast,  and was very impressive to me the way the Divers & Supervisors works,  they reach the work schedule target as well, but with very lack of safety , for me all this come from a bad regulations which no one respects the basic  lines  , like wearing bailouts only when its over 20 feet depth, no one use harness under the Harvest jacket, IMCA guide, (specially if you work in sat with DP ) its very important , i saw divers working over 8 hours in shallow diving depths , because lack of crew,   somebody told me, ( if you works 8 hours in a office , why you could not do the same as diver?)    i would love if IMCA one day could show up here too        thanks for your time &

    attention

    2 people like this

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for your observation, blueshark! What you referred to is EXACTLY why it will help if ALL authority over diving operations are assigned to the USCG.

    2 people like this

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What has to happen too, is the adoption of IMCA guidelines. This is likely to prove to be a stumbling block though as IMCA is not a US body.

     

    Consolidate authority under USCG, and adhere to IMCA guidelines, and you will improve diver safety in the US.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    John, is there a possibility that we will be heard with the new incoming administration? Perhaps if we make the case to them that in the US, there are more stringent occupational safety regulations for a janitor than there are for a  working diver, that the death and injury rates for man hours worked are atrocious, that existing US safety regulations pale in comparison to "Third World" countries, and that due to the lack of consolidation of authority over the industry there is no hope of the statistics changing without seeing significant change in regulation and enforcement?

     

    We could also make it clear to them that there is no need to re-invent the wheel, as far as safety regulations go. Between IMCA D014 and IOGP 411 they can "cut and paste" so to speak, and end up with a substantial and workable regulation. I can assure you that neither IMCA nor IOGP would have a problem with their documents being used as a baseline for regulations.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.


    Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Pro Memoriam

    • S.S. Chauhan
      S.S. Chauhan
    • Christopher Whittaker
      Christopher Whittaker
    • Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
      Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
    • Russ Robinson
      Russ Robinson
    • Mohammed Borhan Jamal
      Mohammed Borhan Jamal
    • Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
      Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
    • Edward Hayman
      Edward Hayman
    • Daniel Heres Ã�lvarez
      Daniel Heres �lvarez
    • Marko Knaps
      Marko Knaps
    • Godwin Udoh
      Godwin Udoh
    • Dave Courcoux
      Dave Courcoux
    • Luke Seabrook
      Luke Seabrook
    • Cristian Zarafu
      Cristian Zarafu
    • Miura Yusuke
      Miura Yusuke
    • Pervinder Kadiyan
      Pervinder Kadiyan
    • Dhirendra Kadiyan
      Dhirendra Kadiyan
    • Rob Holbrook
      Rob Holbrook
    • Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
      Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
    • Louis Ricciarelli
      Louis Ricciarelli
    • Thiago Matheus Coutinho
      Thiago Matheus Coutinho
    • David Sparks
      David Sparks
    • Christopher Logan
      Christopher Logan
    • Pierre Rossouw
      Pierre Rossouw
    • Jonathon Parker
      Jonathon Parker
    • Stephen O'Malley
      Stephen O'Malley
    • Peter Small
      Peter Small
    • John Webb
      John Webb
    • Rajesh Dabbas
      Rajesh Dabbas
    • David Scheinost
      David Scheinost
    • David Mato Garrido
      David Mato Garrido
    • Kenny Kruckenberg
      Kenny Kruckenberg
    • Sondre Birkeland
      Sondre Birkeland
    • Fernando Robles Aller
      Fernando Robles Aller
    • Paul De Waal
      Paul De Waal
    • Chandra
      Chandra
    • Ottavio Baumgartner
      Ottavio Baumgartner
    • Steve Acton
      Steve Acton
    • Tony Eke
      Tony Eke
    • Chandon McGrath
      Chandon McGrath
    • Jamie York
      Jamie York
    • Joseph Gould
      Joseph Gould
    • Luke Rupping
      Luke Rupping
    • Julio Dacosta Gallo
      Julio Dacosta Gallo
    • Leticia Castiglione
      Leticia Castiglione
    • Matt Smock
      Matt Smock
    • Marc Begnaud
      Marc Begnaud
    • Brian Pilkington
      Brian Pilkington
    • Earl Guidry
      Earl Guidry
    • JS Padda
      JS Padda
    • Jarrod Hampton
      Jarrod Hampton
    • David Mitchell
      David Mitchell
    • Chris Hollifield
      Chris Hollifield
    • Brian Ernest
      Brian Ernest
    • Ajesh Gaur
      Ajesh Gaur
    • Kevin George
      Kevin George
    • Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
      Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
    • Jacup Andreas Hentze
      Jacup Andreas Hentze
    • Chris Wilson
      Chris Wilson
    • Olivier Rouxhet
      Olivier Rouxhet
    • Javier Diaz Macias
      Javier Diaz Macias
    • Travis Muller
      Travis Muller
    • Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
      Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
    • Jean Christophe Casagrande
      Jean Christophe Casagrande
    • NK Sharma
      NK Sharma
    • Gerald Chia
      Gerald Chia
    • Radoslav Stoyanov
      Radoslav Stoyanov
    • Rafael Santos Aragão
      Rafael Santos Aragão
    • Israel Franco Marino
      Israel Franco Marino
  • Latest Incident Follow Up Posts

    • Paspaley pearl diver Jarrod Hampton's family seeking answers as inquest into death set down for May The family of a Victorian pearl diver who died off WA's north-west coast has welcomed the scheduling of an inquest five years on, saying lives continued to be put at risk by alleged dubious safety practices. Jarrod Hampton was working as a drift diver for the Paspaley Pearling Company in April 2012 when he got into trouble in the water off Eighty Mile Beach. By the time he was pulled aboard his boat, its crew was unable to revive him. A 10-day coronial inquest has now been set down to run in Perth in May, with Mr Hampton's parents Robyn and Tony and their two other sons planning to travel from their home in Victoria to attend. Ms Hampton welcomed the announcement of the inquest and said she felt "very optimistic". "We've waited many years to get that news. There was a time we thought we weren't going to get an inquest," she said. "We will learn what they did do and what they perhaps should have done, and what maybe should have been in place." Ms Hampton said the doubt surrounding just how her son died had added to the family's distress. "We only live with the memories of him, and we miss him, and the dynamics of our family have changed forever ... we're overwhelmed by his loss," she said.   Family criticises 'archaic' regulations In the wake of the death, safety watchdog WorkSafe charged Paspaley with failing to provide a safe work environment, to which the company pleaded guilty and was fined $60,000. The Broome District Court heard it took the Paspaley crew between five and 10 minutes to bring Mr Hampton onto a boat, at which time efforts to revive him were unsuccessful. However, no charge was ever laid relation to Mr Hampton's death, and there has been no suggestion the company was responsible. The Hampton family has been scathing of the relatively loose regulation of the pearling industry and the lack of change in the wake of their son's death. "There's been no significant improvements, nothing done that would protect someone's life," Ms Hampton said. Pearl diving is regulated under the general diving regulations rather than commercial diving regulations, and Ms Hampton said the inquest would provide an opportunity to have that reviewed. "All the pearl divers must get a commercial fishing licence, so the WA state does see their job as commercial fishing, and yet they've managed to maintain a very archaic diving regulation, the general diving regulations."   Review underway but progress unclear Both Paspaley and the WA Pearl Producers Association have defended the industry's safety record, pointing out that deaths are very rare and saying improvements had been made in recent years. The State Government said in the wake of Mr Hampton's death that it would review safety regulations, but it appears there has been little progress. A working group was formed by WorkSafe after court proceedings finished in 2015 to assess what industry changes were needed. The ABC understands the group has met several times, and is looking at whether the existing non-enforceable industry code of practice needs to be upgraded to a commission code. Diving guidelines are also being reviewed nationally, a process Worksafe has said could have implications for the training requirements in WA's pearling industry. The WA Pearl Producers Association and WorkSafe have been contacted for comment.   Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-22/paspaley-pearl-diver-jarrod-hampton-family-welcomes-inquest-wa/8292170 Feb 22 2017
    • Taken from: http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/nova-scotia/luke-seabrook-diving-death-accident-tidal-power-plant-1.3678009   No closure for family of diver killed at Nova Scotia tidal plant a year ago
      Luke Seabrook's family on mission to prevent divers from dying on the job   The family of a Dartmouth man killed on the job at Nova Scotia Power's Annapolis Tidal Power Plant a year ago is still seeking answers about how and why his death happened. Commercial diver Luke Seabrook, 39, died last July 15 while inspecting the dam's underwater gates. The generating station is located where the powerful Bay of Fundy tides meet the Annapolis River in Annapolis Royal. "He didn't have a hope in hell, nobody would," said Angela Seabrook, Luke's mother, as she stared at the rushing water pouring out of the dam. The Wasaga Beach, Ont., woman travelled to Nova Scotia to see the plant for herself on the eve of the anniversary.   'I need to know' "I have to find out what happened and why it happened before I can forgive," she said. "There might not be anybody to blame for this. It could just be an accident, but I need to know."
      His family has received details from Jarvis DesRoche, the backup diver, who along with the diver supervisor, were providing support from the shore. Luke Seabrook was carrying out the annual inspection of the gate as part of Paul's Diving Service Inc. It was a job he'd done before.  Within a minute or two of going underwater, Seabrook signalled to come up. His support team couldn't pull him up but the line wouldn't budge, so they tied off his line in hopes he wouldn't be dragged farther away. 
      "If Jarvis had gone down, there would be two of them dead," Angela Seabrook said. DesRoche had to wait about an hour for the tides on both sides of the dam gate to equalize before he could retrieve his friend's body.
      Seabrook says her son was found stuck in the gate, which wasn't fully closed, as it should have been. His helmet was wedged in the gap.  The opening allowed the force of the world's highest tides to surge through. The differential pressure on either side of the gate creates a powerful suction. That pressure can be in the tonnes. In the diving world, that hazard is called Delta P, and it's one of the leading causes of death for occupational divers.   'I hope he didn't suffer' Luke Seabrook was found with broken ribs and contusions to his head. His suit was ripped, his mouthpiece was loose.  "I don't know whether he died because his lungs were crushed or he drowned," Angela Seabrook said. She's still waiting for the autopsy report's official cause of death. "All I know is I hope he didn't suffer." For the last year, the provincial department of Labour has been investigating the workplace fatality. It typically takes two years before findings are released and charges, if warranted, are laid. Seabrook's fear is that another diver could die on the job in the meantime.   Department denies CBC request CBC News has asked to see the department's stop-work and compliance orders slapped on Nova Scotia Power and Paul's Diving Service Inc. Those requests have been denied, and that decision is waiting to be reviewed. Rejecting a request for labour department orders is unusual. In previous cases, the department has provided the information to CBC News. Nova Scotia Power has declined an interview. And the dive support team members have not responded to an interview request.   'Things haven't changed' Seabrook has enlisted the help of diving expert Stephen Donovan in her quest for answers. In the '90s, Donovan was a member of the working group that drafted Nova Scotia's diving regulations. He says he walked away from the group because it was split with infighting among different diving groups that had competing interests. The end result, he says, was watered-down regulations. "Things haven't changed from when I was diving in the Bay of Fundy in the middle of the '70s," said Donovan. "Yes, we have better equipment but we still are losing people." Donovan finds it deeply troubling that Luke Seabrook was likely killed because of a danger that is nothing new – differential pressure at a dam.  He says he believes Seabrook's death was preventable. It's high time, he says, for the diving community to make safety a priority.  "Very frustrating that changes haven't been made that I think should've been made."   'We feel forgotten' The wait for information has been agonizing for Seabrook's widow, Sheryl. They were newlyweds when Luke was killed. His last text was haunting and sweet. "Going to work with the changing tides. I love you, I'll talk to you soon," she recalled. The 36-year-old has tried to go back to work, but she's been unsuccessful. Diving was a passion she shared with her husband, but now she can't go back in the water. On this first anniversary of Seabrook's death, she plans to go to the plant for the first time where she'll spend time in quiet meditation.  She'll find a wreath attached to a chain link fence surrounding the dam. It's the only hint of the tragedy. But there will be no closure.  "I think that's something that can only come after the full investigation is disclosed to us, if and when," she said. "We feel forgotten."   
    • If Mrs. Rupping has engaged Delise  - or any other attorney - she has a good chance of getting her answers. The timing will be a negative aspect, I'm sure, although she has had SOME monies sent to her. I smell a rat when the Supervisor says it was his personal money he sent. This sounds very much like Mammoet is trying to insert a layer of plausible denial into the situation...