Jump to content
Divers Association

  • New DCI Modelling

       " Researchers have created a new model for predicting decompression sickness after deep-sea dives that not only estimates the risk, but how severe the symptoms are likely to be.

        The US Navy Diving Manual may incorporate the model into its next update, as will commercial products intended to help recreational divers plan their ascents to avoid "the bends."

        The results appear online on March 15, 2017, in the journal PLOS ONE.

      "The current guidelines only give you a probability as to whether or not decompression sickness is likely to happen after a given dive," said Laurens Howle, professor of mechanical engineering and materials science at Duke, who has been working on these models with the Navy for a decade. "This is the first time we've been able to also address the likely severity of the potential sickness, helping divers determine acceptable risk."

        All risks have two components -- the likelihood of something bad happening and just how bad that something is likely to be. Having a model that accurately provides both aspects will allow divers to better plan safe depths and ascents to help their bodies adjust -- preventing painful and potentially fatal results."

    Link to new DCI modelling



    Scroll to the bottom of the page to download the document as well


    The link to the journal PLOS ONE article is below.


    • Like 1

      Report Article

    User Feedback


    i don't understand this article. You can't predict where a bubble will end up and how painful it will be. Each dive and diver are different. Hence a neurological exam.

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Derek - fascinating  (And NO, I did not follow the maths!).


    Basically used records of over 3,000 actual dives and applied a three state model to predict no DCI, mild DCI (Pain only) and Serious DCI (Cardio/neurological DCI)


    They used the 2008 (Rev 6) USN tables 'no decompression limit' to compare the US Navy's 'standard' of accepting up to a 2% risk of mild DCI and 0.1 % risk of serious DCI (I'm not sure many commercial diving people will accept a hit rate of 'one serious DCI per 1000 dives as normal)


    They concluded that the USN 2008 'no decompression limits' was conservative for mild DCI - ie you could - theoretically!!! - dive longer for the before you reach the 2% risk of mild DCS


    BUT they also noted that you had to 'vastly reduce' bottom times to keep within the 0.1 % risk of serious DCS


    To meet the 0.1% risk of serious DCI, the table they quoted was the French Navy NM90 table.


    Which kind of supports a lot of people's gut feeling that the old USN air tables are a tadge risky when used straight out of the box  - even the US Navy concluded they produced an unacceptably high rate of DCS in the deep air range - That's why they upgraded from Rev 6 to Rev 7 last yea (And why they upped from Rev 5 to Rev 6 in 2008).


    I believe - but am open to being corrected! - that the French Navy tables are based on a Haldanian model (derived from extrapolating data from actual dives) as opposed to Algorythms (bubble modelling maths) which kind of pushes one to think that science is good, but actual experience is better.


    It would be interesting if they re-ran the modelling using the NDL limits from USN Rev 7 to see if the new version is any safer.


    Thanks for posting the link!







    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Pro Memoriam

    • Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
      Carlos Isaias Melipillan Coliboro
    • Pierre Rossouw
      Pierre Rossouw
    • Chandra
    • Billy Ray Lillard
      Billy Ray Lillard
    • Christopher Whittaker
      Christopher Whittaker
    • David Sparks
      David Sparks
    • Sondre Birkeland
      Sondre Birkeland
    • JS Padda
      JS Padda
    • Marko Knaps
      Marko Knaps
    • Earl Guidry
      Earl Guidry
    • Rob Holbrook
      Rob Holbrook
    • David Mato Garrido
      David Mato Garrido
    • Russ Robinson
      Russ Robinson
    • Tony Eke
      Tony Eke
    • Matt Smock
      Matt Smock
    • Fernando Robles Aller
      Fernando Robles Aller
    • Brian Pilkington
      Brian Pilkington
    • S.S. Chauhan
      S.S. Chauhan
    • Miura Yusuke
      Miura Yusuke
    • Radoslav Stoyanov
      Radoslav Stoyanov
    • Chris Wilson
      Chris Wilson
    • Julio Dacosta Gallo
      Julio Dacosta Gallo
    • Kenny Kruckenberg
      Kenny Kruckenberg
    • Thiago Matheus Coutinho
      Thiago Matheus Coutinho
    • Jamie York
      Jamie York
    • Mohammed Borhan Jamal
      Mohammed Borhan Jamal
    • Jarrod Hampton
      Jarrod Hampton
    • Stephen O'Malley
      Stephen O'Malley
    • Dhirendra Kadiyan
      Dhirendra Kadiyan
    • Edward Hayman
      Edward Hayman
    • Ottavio Baumgartner
      Ottavio Baumgartner
    • Luke Rupping
      Luke Rupping
    • Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
      Norlan Vásquez Rodríguez
    • Christopher Logan
      Christopher Logan
    • Jonathon Parker
      Jonathon Parker
    • Rajesh Dabbas
      Rajesh Dabbas
    • David Scheinost
      David Scheinost
    • Brian Ernest
      Brian Ernest
    • Peter Small
      Peter Small
    • Israel Franco Marino
      Israel Franco Marino
    • Godwin Udoh
      Godwin Udoh
    • NK Sharma
      NK Sharma
    • Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
      Joshua Rodriguez Marquez
    • Marc Begnaud
      Marc Begnaud
    • David Mitchell
      David Mitchell
    • Javier Diaz Macias
      Javier Diaz Macias
    • Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
      Richard Wilkinson-Lowe
    • Louis Ricciarelli
      Louis Ricciarelli
    • Jean Christophe Casagrande
      Jean Christophe Casagrande
    • Chandon McGrath
      Chandon McGrath
    • Daniel Heres Ã�lvarez
      Daniel Heres �lvarez
    • Pervinder Kadiyan
      Pervinder Kadiyan
    • Paul De Waal
      Paul De Waal
    • Leticia Castiglione
      Leticia Castiglione
    • Chris Hollifield
      Chris Hollifield
    • Travis Muller
      Travis Muller
    • Rafael Santos Aragão
      Rafael Santos Aragão
    • Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
      Jose Joaquin Lopez Cruz
    • Ajesh Gaur
      Ajesh Gaur
    • Kevin George
      Kevin George
    • John Webb
      John Webb
    • Steve Acton
      Steve Acton
    • Joseph Gould
      Joseph Gould
    • Olivier Rouxhet
      Olivier Rouxhet
    • Dave Courcoux
      Dave Courcoux
    • Luke Seabrook
      Luke Seabrook
    • Gerald Chia
      Gerald Chia
    • Cristian Zarafu
      Cristian Zarafu
  • Latest Incident Follow Up Posts

    • Looks like they are definitely still in business. I can't understand how a company like this can kill a diver and just shut their eyes and go on about business. They know that the only way to stop these stupid accidents from happening is to come forth with details, yet they circle the wagons and cover everything up. So the next time when the same thing happens, these people are equally at fault. Then I have to wonder - where is IMCA in this? Why did they not investigate and release findings to avoid a repeat of this?
    • This is their web page talking it say theyhave contracts https://www.mammoet.com/en/news/
    • I would push to have the Labour Board examine NS Power's role in the incident. You will note I did not call it an accident, because in my opinion it was not.